Surrey Archaeological Society

Historic building recording by C Currie of CKCA prior to alteration, revealed evidence for the evolution of a building that began as a late medieval hall house.

Watching brief by N Griffin and J Russell of ASE carried out prior to construction of an extension revealed no finds or features of archaeological interest.

Watching brief by J Stevenson of SCAU during groundworks on extensions and alterations to the building. The work exposed post-medieval parts of the building, including a chalk floor, and following on from the work of P Gray and A Hughes (345), a photographic record of the interior was produced.

Watching brief by G Jackson of SCC on works for a new extension revealed a stone wall of unknown date. The wall is outside the area affected by foundation work and has been left in situ.

Watching brief carried out by N Shaikhley of SCAU during redevelopment on the neighbouring property to `Hillview’ and the builder’s yard, revealed the site to have been sufficiently disturbed to have removed any archaeological remains which may once have existed.

Three further stages of evaluation by J Perry of SutAS revealed no finds or features of archaeological interest.

Survey undertaken under the direction of C Currie of CKCA, as part of the Community Archaeology Project for SCC and SyAS, to assess whether the study area was suitable for designation as an ASHLV. Both documentary research and fieldwork have added to existing knowledge of the area, and work is continuing in 2002.

Investigation by G Cole of SHAHT as part of an ongoing training programme, revealed mainly post-medieval features associated with land drainage.

Dendrochronological dating by M Bridge of EH to assist the ongoing work on the building and contribute to a reconsideration of its listed grading. The building contains a room with post-Dissolution paintings (317, 321), and a single timber in that room gave a likely felling period of AD1485--1517, slightly earlier than had been previously assumed for the wall on stylistic grounds.

Evaluation by S Deeves of PCA did not any finds or features of archaeological interest.