Surrey Archaeological Society

Evaluation by M Davies for SyAS, incorporating a geophysical survey by the Bartlett-Clark Consultancy, of a site identified from aerial photographs by J Hampton in 1992. The geophysical survey confirmed the presence of buildings, which were subsequently tested by trial excavation. A villa and separate bath house, occupied from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD, but badly plough damaged, were revealed.

Interim report received on the survey of these limeworks by N Catford and M Tadd of SIHG and Subterranea Britannica in 1994-5. Apart from the main bank of draw kilns, a pair of rare ‘Brockham kilns’ were also recorded.

A watching brief by J Stevenson of SCAU was maintained on the construction of a swimming pool, for Mr & Mrs Burchell, in an area where Neolithic flints have previously been recorded. No features or finds of archaeological interest were noted. (321)

Evaluation by R Poulton of SCAU, for Crystal Palace FC, in advance of the construction of a number of pitches. No features or finds of archaeological interest were recorded. (314)

Evaluation by J Pine of TVAS, for the Diocese of Southwark, of a site for residential development, revealed no features or finds of archaeological interest.

A watching brief by the BSAG on works for a new extension to the rear of this 15th century building revealed a brick floor of probably 16th or 17th century date.

Partial excavation of an infilled well in the garden by the BSAG and CNHSS. The shaft was lined with hand made and mostly unfrogged bricks, suggesting the feature is late 18th/early 19th century in date. A cottage is first shown in this vicinity on a map of 1820. The well was infilled late in the 19th century.

Evaluation by M Dover of SCAU for Croudace Homes, of an area for residential development, revealed no features or find of archaeological interest, although the site appeared relatively undisturbed. (321)

Evaluation by M Dover of SCAU for Croudace Homes, of an area for residential development, revealed no features or find of archaeological interest, although the site appeared relatively undisturbed. (321)

A watching brief by M Saaler and J Matthews of the BSAG on works for a new extension to this building, which was originally part of the stable block of Caterham Court. Flint and mortar foundations and an earlier foundation trench were revealed, as well as a pebbled surface, all presumably relating to different phases of stable building. (303)